From b1a9ce14b51423bf676df768278fd6b6d6579ca1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthijs Kooijman Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:55:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix two references. --- Chapters/Normalization.tex | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Chapters/Normalization.tex b/Chapters/Normalization.tex index fbad0ea..db743fc 100644 --- a/Chapters/Normalization.tex +++ b/Chapters/Normalization.tex @@ -1610,8 +1610,7 @@ simply inline the let bindings that have a polymorphic type, which should (eventually) make sure that the polymorphic expression is applied to a type and/or dictionary, which can - \refdef{beta-reduction} - then be removed by β-reduction. + then be removed by β-reduction (\in{section}[sec:normalization:beta]). Since both type and dictionary arguments are not representable, \refdef{representable} @@ -1713,7 +1712,7 @@ η-abstraction also introduces extra applications (the application of the let expression to \lam{q} in the above example). These applications can then propagated down by the application propagation - transformation (\in{section}[sec:normalization:approp]). In our + transformation (\in{section}[sec:normalization:appprop]). In our example, the \lam{q} and \lam{r} variable will be propagated into the let expression and then into the case expression: -- 2.30.2