From 61ec153338486a326c585358961708a1e26e2667 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthijs Kooijman Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:16:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Use \in instead of \at to refer to section numbers. \at refers to page numbers instead. --- Chapters/Future.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Chapters/Future.tex b/Chapters/Future.tex index 38904be..6be0ba8 100644 --- a/Chapters/Future.tex +++ b/Chapters/Future.tex @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Using custom combinators would work \section{Recursion} The main problems of recursion have been described in -\at{section}[sec:recursion]. In the current implementation, recursion is +\in{section}[sec:recursion]. In the current implementation, recursion is therefore not possible, instead we rely on a number of implicit list-recursive builtin functions. @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ take multiple cycles. Some examples include: \item A large combinatoric expressions that would introduce a very long combinatoric path and thus limit clock frequency. Such an expression could be broken up into multiple stages, which effectively results in a pipelined - system (see also \at{section}[sec:future:pipelining]) with a known delay. + system (see also \in{section}[sec:future:pipelining]) with a known delay. There should probably be some way for the developer to specify the cycle division of the expression, since automatically deciding on such a division is too complex and contains too many tradeoffs, at least initially. -- 2.30.2