From: Matthijs Kooijman Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:16:43 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Use \in instead of \at to refer to section numbers. X-Git-Tag: final-thesis~196 X-Git-Url: https://git.stderr.nl/gitweb?p=matthijs%2Fmaster-project%2Freport.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=61ec153338486a326c585358961708a1e26e2667;hp=a5a906640aceb70689f66e53b5175d93bc9505ff Use \in instead of \at to refer to section numbers. \at refers to page numbers instead. --- diff --git a/Chapters/Future.tex b/Chapters/Future.tex index 38904be..6be0ba8 100644 --- a/Chapters/Future.tex +++ b/Chapters/Future.tex @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Using custom combinators would work \section{Recursion} The main problems of recursion have been described in -\at{section}[sec:recursion]. In the current implementation, recursion is +\in{section}[sec:recursion]. In the current implementation, recursion is therefore not possible, instead we rely on a number of implicit list-recursive builtin functions. @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ take multiple cycles. Some examples include: \item A large combinatoric expressions that would introduce a very long combinatoric path and thus limit clock frequency. Such an expression could be broken up into multiple stages, which effectively results in a pipelined - system (see also \at{section}[sec:future:pipelining]) with a known delay. + system (see also \in{section}[sec:future:pipelining]) with a known delay. There should probably be some way for the developer to specify the cycle division of the expression, since automatically deciding on such a division is too complex and contains too many tradeoffs, at least initially.