X-Git-Url: https://git.stderr.nl/gitweb?p=matthijs%2Fmaster-project%2Freport.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=Chapters%2FPrototype.tex;h=d5ae72fd84f32b6375ee434496d12136732b8b3f;hp=adae92ca1dc63bc573cf64de600d53ec77c9ffe8;hb=a472d8d94908d8f466a4cafe4d55c4c9410161d8;hpb=33275ac17aefc80c72f52d2cf36f171e6d9b175e

diff --git a/Chapters/Prototype.tex b/Chapters/Prototype.tex
index adae92c..d5ae72f 100644
--- a/Chapters/Prototype.tex
+++ b/Chapters/Prototype.tex
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
   has gone through a number of design iterations which we will not completely
   describe here.
 
-  \section{Input language}
+  \section[sec:prototype:input]{Input language}
     When implementing this prototype, the first question to ask is: What
     (functional) language will we use to describe our hardware? (Note that
     this does not concern the \emph{implementation language} of the compiler,
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 
     TODO: Was Haskell really a good choice? Perhaps say this somewhere else?
 
-  \subsection{Output format}
+  \section[sec:prototype:output]{Output format}
     The second important question is: What will be our output format? Since
     our prototype won't be able to program FPGA's directly, we'll have to have
     output our hardware in some format that can be later processed and