From: Christiaan Baaij Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:08:24 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Fix some spelling mistakes in related work section X-Git-Url: https://git.stderr.nl/gitweb?a=commitdiff_plain;h=9b3fa71d1966be5a8b2ef467c64c3405bece1434;p=matthijs%2Fmaster-project%2Fdsd-paper.git Fix some spelling mistakes in related work section --- diff --git "a/c\316\273ash.lhs" "b/c\316\273ash.lhs" index b11aefe..12ab1d9 100644 --- "a/c\316\273ash.lhs" +++ "b/c\316\273ash.lhs" @@ -1502,9 +1502,8 @@ automated synthesis is restricted to the synchronous model of computation. Though ForSyDe offers higher-order functions and polymorphism, ForSyDe's choice elements are limited to \hs{if} and \hs{case} expressions. ForSyDe's explicit conversions, where function have to be wrapped in processes and -process have to be wrapped in systems, combined with the explicit -instantiations of components also makes ForSyDe more verbose than -\CLaSH. +processes have to be wrapped in systems, combined with the explicit +instantiations of components, also makes ForSyDe more verbose than \CLaSH. Lava~\cite{Lava} is a hardware description language, embedded in Haskell, and focuses on the structural representation of hardware. Like \CLaSH, Lava has @@ -1516,9 +1515,7 @@ elements to be captured within the circuit descriptions. In this respect \CLaSH\ differs from Lava, in that all of Haskell's choice elements, such as \hs{case}-expressions and pattern matching, are synthesized to choice elements in the eventual circuit. Consequently, descriptions containing rich control -structures can be specified in a far more user-friendly way in \CLaSH\ than -possible within Lava. As a result, the control structures are also less -error-prone. +structures can be specified in a more user-friendly way in \CLaSH\ than possible within Lava, and are hence less error-prone. Bluespec~\cite{Bluespec} is a high-level synthesis language that features guarded atomic transactions and allows for the automated derivation of control