Update parts of related work section on Lava and VHDL-2008

diff --git a/cλash.lhs b/cλash.lhs
index 438cce4290f1004a5f12713d2dcb243f7f5602d3..c4a281f53f9d3e481545c29f745b401d9c30428e 100644 (file)
--- a/cλash.lhs
+++ b/cλash.lhs
@@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ tools for formal verification. Lava descriptions are actually circuit
 generators when viewed from a synthesis viewpoint, in that the language 
 elements of Haskell, such as choice, can be used to guide the circuit 
 generation. If a developer wants to insert a choice element inside an actual 
-circuit he will have to specify this explicitly as a component. 
+circuit he will have to explicitly instantiate a multiplexer-like component. 
 
 In this respect \CLaSH\ differs from Lava, in that all the choice elements, 
 such as case-statements and pattern matching, are synthesized to choice 
@@ -1145,11 +1145,9 @@ mentioned in this section.
 
 The merits of polymorphic typing, combined with higher-order functions, are 
 now also recognized in the `main-stream' hardware description languages, 
-exemplified by the new \VHDL-2008 standard~\cite{VHDL2008}. \VHDL-2008 has 
-support to specify types as generics, thus allowing a developer to describe 
+exemplified by the new \VHDL-2008 standard~\cite{VHDL2008}. \VHDL-2008 support for generics has been extended to types, allowing a developer to describe 
 polymorphic components. Note that those types still require an explicit 
-generic map, whereas type-inference and type-specialization are implicit in 
-\CLaSH.
+generic map, whereas types can be automatically inferred in \CLaSH.
 
 % Wired~\cite{Wired},, T-Ruby~\cite{T-Ruby}, Hydra~\cite{Hydra}. 
 %